Stewards/Elections 2019/Votes/Base

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Base talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: uk-N, ru-4, en-2.5, be-3 (reading), ja-0.5, es-0.5, nl-0.5, slavic-0.5
  • Personal info: (English)

    I am Base. I am a native Ukrainian speaker, I also speak near-native Russian, I understand Belarusian reasonably well, and I speak Upper-Intermediate English. As to other languages, I can get rudimentary Japanese, Spanish, and Dutch, as well as other Slavic languages.

    I am in Wikimedia movement for almost eight years.

    Originally being from Ukrainian community, my second home is Meta-Wiki where I serve as an administrator for 3 years. I have participated to a bigger or smaller extent in most of the sister projects, in a couple of Wikipedias, and the focal point of my activity is the international Community being Meta, Outreachwiki, to a smaller extent Commons and Wikidata.

    I have never been much a content contributor, rather focusing on different meta areas such as enforcing Licensing policy, designing templates, running bots mostly for some non-trivial (i.e. not pywikibot predefined) tasks, as well as translation of the global content (on Meta, Outreachwiki, Commons,, and Wikidata) and the interface (on

    I am not bereft of controversy, you can read about it on my Meta RfA. There is nothing I can do about things done but learn from them, and hopefully I am doing a much better job now.

    As a Meta-Wiki admin, I already hold some global permissions, such as global abuse filter rights, until recently Central Notice rights, and global * blacklist modification access.

    I see the following areas as my primary focus be I elected a steward:

    • SRP — I've interacted with the page many times to request rather a spectrum of rights for myself and other users on different wikis, I believe I know procedures and practices well enough.
    • SRUC — I do not hold the account renamer flag, but I am familiar with some possible pitfalls of the process, also having undergo usurpations and some juggling with my accounts for SUL finalisation I know some of the finer details.
    • SRM — some requests require mass actions, and I can conjure bots/scripts which will help; some require some insight, and I believe I have broad enough experience to have a good one.
    • SRB — as a botmaster myself I think I would be the right person to manage those.
    • SRGP — I am well aware what each of the global flags is for, no rocket science here otherwise.
    • SRG — I will keep an eye on unblock requests, I know that some blocks affect hundreds of good faith editors and there's room for improvement in better response to those.
    • OS — I am familiar with the policy, and I will do my best to ensure prompt reaction to the requests.

    I will also respond to the stewards queue in OTRS, I have experience with OTRS per se on its permissions frontier.

    As much as my time and the boundaries of policies would allow, I will try to help small wikis with some technical set up.

    I will also do SRCU, I am familiar with the policy as well as the tool for what it is worth, but I do not see myself as an LTA war vanguard fighter. I have experience in SWMT from quite a while ago, but I will not have time and energy to chase after vandals all the time.

    My own criteria of a good Steward candidate include cross-wiki contributions (I do not believe a person contributing to a single wiki or two only would make a good steward), counter-vandalism activity (stewardship revolves around it this way or the other), and familiarity with the global policies where it is possible to gauge that. I believe myself to be competent in this regard. Stewardship is probably that one flag that is a big deal. It is a big decision for me to decide to run. I feel like I am ready to help, now it is up to the community to decide if that help is needed.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2019/Questions#Base

If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2019|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   - Good cross-wiki experience. As far as the blocks/desysop issues, that was almost 5 years ago, and did not involve any dishonest actions. When looking at the aforementioned RFA, one would think that Base would have been a controversial Meta admin and perhaps have been desysopped already. Three years after that RFA, his Meta adminship has been fairly bland. I think his being a steward would be similar. --Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  2. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Trusted user and actively working in the combat of cross-wiki vandalism/spam. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  3. Érico (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Érico (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  4. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   per Rschen7754. Base has the required experience and I have confidence in him using the steward rights appropriately. Vogone (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  5. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019  . Ghilt (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  6. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Yep. This candidate has enough experience for the Stewards team. --Stïnger (会話) 14:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  7. Ali32liver (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   --Ali32liver (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  8. Cohaf (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019  Base is a fine candidate. I am not that worried about the blocks as they seems editorial disputes. Their activity is well and from their answers seems very competent. I am very impressed when they mentioned the apilimits for SRB. That's shows depth in experience. Their answer to my genreal questions shows humility, and I am very moved. No red flags elsewhere, Support.--Cohaf (talk) more details of my vote here 14:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  9. Wildly boy (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   I think that he will be a good steward. Wildly boy (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  10. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   This is a weak yes given past issues, but I don't think they will resurface in the future. Nihlus 14:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  11. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hampcky (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2019
  12. Diannaa (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Support Support upon review of answers to questions I feel this person is a strong candidate for steward. Diannaa (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  13. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   TonyBallioni (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  14. JOAN (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   JOAN ~ (Questions?) 14:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  15. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Thanks for your willingness to serve as a steward! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  16. Ruyaba (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 14:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  17. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   Miniapolis 15:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  18. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  19. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Good language abilities and also enough experience. A clear yes from me. Trijnsteltalk 15:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  20. Vermont (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Some concerns, but nothing that would influence me to oppose. Good cross-wiki experience, and your answers to questions were more than sufficient. Vermont (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  21. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   —DerHexer (Talk) 15:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  22. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   – Meiræ 15:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  23. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Base, while he has had some issues in the past, is overall a thoughtful and knowledgeable person who would be a valuable addition to the team. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  24. Wojciech Pędzich (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Would be good to see yuo perform these duties. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 15:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  25. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by علاء)2019   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  26. Kaviraf (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019   Kaviraf (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  27. Yuriy kosygin (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019   ✈IGOR 〒 Tell Me What?! . Wikivoyager 16:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  28. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   I am not concerned by his past issues, they happened a long time ago. His answers to the questions show that he has a high understanding of the steward role. Esteban16 (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  29. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Fenikals (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  30. BRPever (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   BRP ever 17:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  31. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   MZaplotnik(talk) 17:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  32. Adithyak1997 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Adithyak1997 (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  33. Brunei (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Base is fine. Brunei (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  34. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   See no problems. Dreamy Jazz (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  35. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   cyrfaw (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  36. SQL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   SQLQuery me! 19:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  37. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Novak Watchmen (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  38. Berean Hunter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019  
    ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 19:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  39. Gdarin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Good candidate Gdarin | talk 19:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  40. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 19:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  41. MrX (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   MrX (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  42. -revi (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   — regards, Revi 19:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  43. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Nemo 20:06, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  44. Mehman97 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Good luck ;) Mehman 97 20:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  45. Swarm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Looks great! Swarm (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  46. Rax (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   a bit weak "yes", s. @User:Nihlus (10). Good luck! -- Rax (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  47. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Wetterwolke (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  48. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Good luck Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  49. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Gereon K. (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  50. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Answers to questions show good judgment. AGK ■ 22:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  51. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Relatively good answers to questions, no doubt they'll be an asset. Hiàn (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  52. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   隼鷹 (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  53. Visem (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Visem (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  54. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Muhraz (talk) 04:41, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  55. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   –Ammarpad (talk) 05:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  56. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   — Bukhari (Talk!) 07:37, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  57. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   KPFC💬 10:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  58. Frhdkazan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Frhdkazan (talk) 11:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  59. EVinente (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   EVinente (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  60. Enki Barthel (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Enki Barthel (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  61. Ayagaures 0 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Ayagaures 0 (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
       Sapphirewhirlwind (Not eligible, checked by Hiàn)   Seems like the right kind of guy to be handling this responsibility. Zach Hontiveros Pagkalinawan (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  62. Mercy (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Mercy (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  63. Димон2711 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   as I know, he will be the first Ukrainian steward. Димон2711 (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  64. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Good candidate DePlusJean (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  65. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   should be fine —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 19:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  66. CreativeC (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   CreativeC (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  67. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 19:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  68. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   I'm supporting based alone on the brillant answer to Esteban16's question. MF-W 21:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  69. Mbrickn (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Mbrickn (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  70. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Anatoliy (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  71. Antanana (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   アンタナナ 00:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  72. Stanglavine (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Rafael (stanglavine) msg 00:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  73. Afifa Afrin (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  74. K.e.coffman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   thank you for volunteering. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  75. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   FASTILY 07:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  76. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Savh)2019   Linedwell [talk] 08:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  77. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   FiliP ██ 09:41, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  78. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Taivo (talk) 10:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  79. J ansari (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019   -J. Ansari Talk 12:08, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  80. Alan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Alan (talk) 14:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  81. B20180 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   B20180 (talk) 19:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  82. Fitindia (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   FitIndia Talk 19:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  83. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Iluvatar (talk) 20:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  84. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Mahveotm (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  85. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   My recent interactions with Base have all been positive. Legoktm (talk) 07:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  86. Otourly (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Otourly (talk) 07:21, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  87. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   *Youngjin (talk) 08:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  88. Sreenandhini (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Sreenandhini (talk) 08:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  89. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Shizhao (talk) 08:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  90. Dravinia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   --Dravinia (talk) 13:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  91. Euro know (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Euro know (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  92. Seewolf (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Harald Krichel (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  93. علاء (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   --Alaa :)..! 23:50, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  94. Galahad (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 03:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  95. فيصل (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Faisal talk 03:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  96. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Centaur271188 (talk) 08:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  97. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  98. Arif80s (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Arif80s (talk) 08:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  99. Krd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Krd 09:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  100. Mardetanha (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Mardetanha talk 10:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  101. 1.02 editor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   as per above 1.02 editor (talk) 11:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  102. JDuggan101 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   JDuggan101 (talk) 12:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  103. Nolispanmo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Nolispanmo (talk) 12:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
       Jubair Sayeed Linas (Not eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)   Jubair Sayeed Linas (talk) 14:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  104. QEDK (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   QEDK (talkenwiki) 15:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  105. Klein Muçi (Eligible, checked by Stanglavine)2019   Judging from his answers this looks like a good candidate. Klein Muçi (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  106. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Richardkiwi (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  107. Kubura (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Kubura (talk) 19:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  108. ImmortalWizard (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   ImmortalWizard (talk) 19:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  109. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Gharouni 23:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  110. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   looks qualified to me. Dolotta (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
       User456541 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   –User456541 23:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  111. Meracritus (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Please contribute more on Belarusian wiki. Meracritus (talk) 00:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  112. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Well-known user. The near-native skills in Russian are helpful. Wolverène (talk) 07:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  113. Saig Keryann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Saig Keryann (talk) 14:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  114. Asobiyafuul (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   I expect it for his moves. Asobiyafuul (talk) 15:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  115. Sj (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   With thanks. –SJ talk  17:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  116. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Good language abilities, first Ukrainian steward. --Kusurija (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  117. 水瀬悠志 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   水瀬悠志 (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  118. Bohdan Bondar (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2019   liked constructive answers Bohdan Bondar (talk) 08:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
       ჯეო (Not eligible, checked by Stïnger)   ჯეო (talk) 11:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  119. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:21, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  120. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Buggia 17:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  121. Malikaveedu (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Not comments Malikaveedu (talk) 17:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  122. Holder (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   --Holder (talk) 17:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  123. Fabiorahamim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Fabiorahamim (talk) 07:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  124. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2019   Uğurlar arzu edirəm! ►Cekli829 10:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  125. Cyrus noto3at bulaga (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2019   Cyrus noto3at bulaga (Talk to me) 10:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  126. Klemen Kocjancic (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2019   Klemen Kocjančič (Talk - Fast reply) 11:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  127. Sakhalinio (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Sakhalinio (talk) 15:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
       ჯეო (Not eligible, checked by Stïnger)   Hi from Georgia (country)--ჯეო (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
       Rprpr (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Rprpr (talk) 15:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  128. Ymnes (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Ymnes (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  129. Aleator (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Answers and contribs. convinced me. Aleator (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  130. Anton V. (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Anton V. (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  131. StraussInTheHouse (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2019   I like your attitude, everyone makes mistakes, you appear to have learned from them. SITH (talk) 18:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  132. M4r51n (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   M4r51n (talk) 18:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  133. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   ArdiPras95 (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  134. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Eurodyne (talk) 23:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  135. Sleeps-Darkly (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 01:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  136. Saint Johann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   stjn[ru] 10:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  137. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Sebleouf (talk) 11:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  138. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Eihel (talk) 11:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  139. Draa kul (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Draa kul (talk) 20:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  140. FF-11 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   ... But please use a diffrent account for your bot! FF-11 (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  141. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   --Ejensyd (talk) 12:31, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  142. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Jusjih (talk) 21:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  143. Effeietsanders (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Have generally positive experiences with Base over the course of many years. Could sometimes do with a tiny bit more flexibility, but everyone has their strengths. Effeietsanders (talk) 04:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  144. Mustafa desamangalam (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Great to know for your willingness to serve Stewards Mustafa desamangalam (talk) 05:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  145. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 12:35, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  146. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Great candidature. Jfblanc (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  147. Tiven2240 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Tiven2240 (talk) 14:56, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
       Fabe56 (Not eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)   Fabe56 (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  148. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  17:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  149. Snookerado (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   Snookerado (talk) 18:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  150. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Luke081515 21:45, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  151. Jeffrey Kim (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Jeffrey Kim (talk) 11:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  152. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 14:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
       Masumrezarock100 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   I think he would be a good steward. He has experience and so other things. Masumrezarock100 (talk) 15:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  153. Clerkon (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019   Clerkon (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  154. Kirbanzo (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Kirbanzo (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  155. مھتاب احمد (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019   مھتاب احمد (talk) 07:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  156. Ата (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   From the answers to questions I see that this user evolved over the years in the movement, and is able to respond appropriately to the situations that might arise. I trust that he is fit for being a steward. Ата (talk) 09:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  157. Vj7895 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Vj7895 (talk) 10:42, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  158. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2019   Waddie96 (talk) 11:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
       Salomeeaalexandru899 (Not eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)   Salomeeaalexandru899 (talk) 12:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  159. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Wikit 18:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  160. FN Markus (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   FN Markus (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
  161. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Rzuwig 08:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
  162. Fed4ev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   I'm glad to see this nomination and supporting Base Fed4ev (talk) 15:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   “Policies are absolute for me” — sorry, but policies are not the whole story. To showcase a recent example, there was no local procedure followed for the desysopping of am:User:Til Eulenspiegel (who would go on to get globally banned), but the near unanimous consensus was that it was necessary. The events of 5 years ago still leave me with a bit of sour taste in my mouth.—Jasper Deng (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
    I think this quote has unintentionally been taken out of context, so for the sake of fairness, here is the full quote: "While I would want to protect the victim, policies are absolute for me, and while in some projects regular contributors can step out of those by WP:IAR, it is not a benefit stewards can enjoy." --Vogone (talk) 03:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
    Well, the last part should’ve been included in my quote. “not a benefit stewards can enjoy” is totally wrong.—Jasper Deng (talk) 00:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  2. Clinamental (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Clinamental (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  3. NickK (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Knowing the user from Ukrainian Wikipedia, I unfortunately have to confirm that the statement policies are absolute for me is true in its worst shape. I can confirm that Base does have advanced technical skills and would be definitely able to use steward tools, thus there is no issue here. The problem is that Base applies policies to the letter in cases where there is clear consensus or clear action needed but a comma is lacking somewhere. I mentioned a few on Meta RfA: this behaviour is rather funny if Base is defending your point (as his argument is often technically right) but it is extremely annoying if you disagree with him (as it usually turns discussion from something serious like policy or arbitration issues to something extremely minor like an extra comma). While this may work on Meta where most users are good at reading policies, this can be very annoying for users from small wikis who may hardly understand English — NickK (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  4. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Seems to misunderstand the fundamental necessity of discretion. ——SerialNumber54129 07:14, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  5. Brainswiffer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   --Brainswiffer (talk) 11:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  6. Gog the Mild (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Per NickK and SN54129. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  7. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Per Nick and SN54129 –Davey2010Talk 17:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  8. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Ankry (talk) 20:36, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  9. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   "Policies are absolute for me" the world isn't black and white, but in shades of gray. I think having an absolutist view would not be ideal for a steward. --Cameron11598 (talk) 23:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  10. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Mirer (talk) 04:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  11. Arystanbek (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Arystanbek (talk) 09:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  12. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Absolutist approach to policies - no way Herby talk thyme 11:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  13. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Soul Train (talk) 21:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  14. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Dostojewskij (talk) 22:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  15. Küñall (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Küñall (talk) 02:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  16. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   ~Cybularny Speak? 11:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  17. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Simplexity22 (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  18. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   ~ Amory (utc) 20:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  19. CoolSkittle (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019  . CoolSkittle (talk) 01:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  20. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Fish and karate (talk) 11:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  21. P. W. Siebert (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   P. W. Siebert (talk) 13:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  22. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Would like to see more administration experience on content wikis. — xaosflux Talk 14:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  23. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Too much linear thinking. Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  24. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Kudpung (talk) 17:19, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  25. DGG (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   DGG (talk) 07:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  26. გიო ოქრო (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   გიო ოქრო (talk) 23:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  27. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 23:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  28. Pamputt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Pamputt (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  29. Abductive (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Do not see adding value. Abductive (talk) 10:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
  30. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   just say no to absolutists Slowking4 (talk) 14:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  31. Rhododendrites (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019   — Rhododendrites talk \\ 01:13, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
       Andyzweb (Not eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)   Andyzweb (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   Still considering some previous incidents (and possible misuse of rights), but maybe a suitable candidate now. GZWDer (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  2. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019   After five years I have no reasons to believe the the "bot incident" is over but I'd like to see a "test" in similar circumstances, though there was no chance to do so. Vituzzu (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
       MyWayInVape (Not eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)   MyWayInVape (talk) 02:04, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  3. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Santasa99 (talk) 16:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
  4. Piotr Bart (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Piotr Bart (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  5. Steindy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   Steindy (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  6. Techso01 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   Techso01 (talk) 05:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  7. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019   I'm really concerned that his views about policies will be troublesome for small wikis. ~ℳɑrio (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  8. 蟲蟲飛 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   蟲蟲飛♡♡→♡℃Talk 02:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  9. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019   DannyS712 (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
  10. Schnellbehalter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Schnellbehalter (talk) 15:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  11. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019   hardly active as either a user or an administrator locally for past while at meta, is enough to make me hesitate. No doubt has the skills  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:59, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  12. Ping08 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   — Ping08 (talk) 19:32, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  13. Oshawott 12 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019   Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 02:55, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  14. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 16:02, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  15. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019   A trustworthy user who will likely do a good job, but I disagree with an absolutist interpretation of policy. Kurtis (talk) 17:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  16. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019   Stephan1000000 (talk) 06:09, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  17. Wiki tamil 100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019   Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 19:42, 20 February 2019 (UTC)