Stewards/Confirm/2017

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Translate this page at Template:Steward confirmations.

Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Stewards (2017 Confirmations)

The 2017-18 Confirmation will begin on 8 February, and will finish on 28 February.

The 2017-18 Steward Confirmations are an opportunity for the Wikimedia community to comment on the performance of existing stewards. To make the process as smooth as possible, the confirmations are organized as follows.

To comment, please log in with an account that has edits (on any wiki) before 8 February. During the 2017 Elections, please mention if you are comfortable or unhappy with the use of steward tools of any of the people listed below and why.

After the election, stewards (including the newly-elected ones) are invited to review the confirmation comments and to give their impression of the outcome (consensus to confirm/remove etc.) on Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2017 for every steward who stood for confirmation. Of course, they are not required to do this for every candidate and will be especially careful to do it regarding someone about whom they expressed strong opinions in the confirmation. Non-steward comments are welcome outside of the "Final Decision" section, subject to the usual expectations of civility. Confirmation discussions will last one week after the appointment of the newly elected stewards. This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

All stewards elected before February 2017 will undergo this process.

See also:


Purge the cache of this page?



Ajraddatz[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en-N, fr-1
  • Personal info: Hello everyone. I've been a steward for three years now, and with your permission I would like to continue in that role for another year. I've maintained a reasonable level of activity since being elected, and you can view a breakdown of my activity this year at this page. Most of my work in this role deals with responding to cross-wiki abuse, assigning local permissions through Meta-Wiki, and participating in discussions with the group as a whole. If confirmed, I will continue to be active in these areas. Outside of the steward role, I am still an active member of the Wikidata community, and I occasionally write some articles on the English Wikipedia. As always, if you have any questions, I would be glad to answer them. Thanks, – Ajraddatz (talk) 07:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments about Ajraddatz[edit]

  • Keep Keep Itay17 (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Hanay (talk) 12:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Itti (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove no confidence. It does not solve the problems of the community--Шухрат Саъдиев (talk) 13:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Is there anything in particular you are referring to? Edit: it seems that he is referring to this, where I referred him to SRCU so that the request could be handled in a neutral location. My advice there still stands, though I commented again to clarify. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    We are talking just solution of the voting procedure Administrator User: Jaloliddin Madaminov, which ruled User: Ajraddatz 19.01.2017.

See: the procedure of voting at the Administrator User: Jaloliddin Madaminov. https://tg.wiktionary.org/ Violation of the voting of the administrator Dagir99 and User: Fight M users registered 12.01.2017 and 13.01.2017??? No answer to this question from Ajraddatz? See Дархост ба унвони мудир/Jaloliddin Madaminov--Шухрат Саъдиев (talk) 08:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Avraham[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, he-2
  • Personal info: As per previous years, I would like to express my gratitude for the community's continued trust in my contributions, and I would like to continue in this role for the upcoming year. While not the most active steward, I believe I contribute value in almost all steward areas, especially in discussions and decisions which may not always be visible on-wiki due to privacy issues. While I have reduced my Wikimedia-wide activities this past year (having voluntarily relinquished Oversight on the Commons) I think that the experience I bring from various janitorial positions across the projects will continue to help the corpus of Stewards in the coming year. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 16:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments about Avraham[edit]

  • Keep Keep Active enough (barely) and actions were reasonable. --Rschen7754 14:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove 11/12 months with less than 5 steward actions and 4/12 months with 0 actions do not leave much of a basis for prolonged access. Little visible use of access has been criticised by many in the past years as well and now claiming to have reduced Wikimedia-wide activity even more does not look promising at all. Anyway, thanks for the past valuable service. --Vogone (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per Vogone. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep, no reason to remove. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC).Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per Vogone...--Stemoc 14:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep No minimum requirement for activity, and their work has been good. Miniapolis 14:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral The user has not been active in the last time, even so, I do not see any inconveniences to remain steward. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove I agree with Vogone. --Gce (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per Vogone, whats the point of having the tools if you aren't using them to help the community? Cameron11598 (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral Great editor, but like those above I am concerned about the lack of activity. -FASTILY 19:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Does important work behind the scenes; a wise head when wise heads are needed. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep per many years of experience —DoRD talk 21:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - no objection --Rax (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per Vogone --DCB (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -jkb- 21:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per Vogone. MechQuester (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Not active enough for my standards. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Bjarlin (talk) 23:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC) ok, per StevenJ81 and DoRD, and because not everything he does is visible (OS)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Not active enough. Iazyges (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2008! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove:per Vogone--Eager Lin (Message) 01:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Geagea (talk) 06:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove -- O.Koslowski (talk) 07:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep I am prepared to believe him when he says that he "contribute[s] value in ... discussions and decisions which may not always be visible on-wiki due to privacy issues". Counting "steward actions" (which I assume refers to actions recorded in logs) would miss these types of contributions to private discussions among stewards. This, that and the other (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep, while he is not the most active steward, he seems to have the right experience and make good contributions to the functioning of stewards as a group. I don't see any problems with him keeping the rights — NickK (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Leon saudanha (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Chansey (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove – completely agree with Vogone – KPFC 💬 21:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per Vogone. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove  Klaas `Z4␟` V:  16:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Avi provides good thoughts and knowledge to the steward group. While not the most active steward I'd very much regret loosing his advices and work. —MarcoAurelio 21:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral --Krd 11:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove It seems that you don't really need the tools... --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 18:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --თოგო (D) 21:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Logged actions are not the only meter of someone's activity. User is eminently sensible, so why not? Craig Franklin (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC).Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep competent, and based on other's stewards favourable comments; could do more visible work to maintain confidence of the community (I did equivocate)  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Archenzo (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Really too little use of the steward tools. Global renames can be done with Global rename rights only. And I don't agree with the argument about his contributions "behind the scenes". I didn't remember anything interesting from the past year, so I now searched my mail archive, and sorry to say, but I found no valauble contributions to difficult "discussions and decisions". --MF-W 17:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I'm still neutral on this for now, but I don't think that Avraham is very active in our internal discussions. He has made it to a couple of the calls, but there is almost no activity on the list - especially on the difficult cases where his input could really be valuable. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • @MF-Warburg and Ajraddatz: Avraham has no global rename rights. If he loses steward rights, then he can't rename anyone anymore. Besides that, he also used the steward rights for 2 CU cases in April ("second opinion") and in Decembre and did a lot of other right changes (see Special:Log/rights/Avraham) which he all can't do anymore without steward rights. Then other stewards certainly have to do more. I don't see a logical reason for that, if he does things well, and there is noone doubting that. I don't see another reason for removing here but only "inactivity", but he's not that inactive. --Bjarlin (talk) 13:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • As I said, I'm neutral on this request. I generally don't agree with inactivity as a valid rationale for removal, without some indication that such inactivity is causing errors. Or if the person is totally not here anymore. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Gridditsch (talk) 08:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Richardkiwi (talk) 14:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Plagiat (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove as no demonstrated need for the right. Feel free to reapply if you decide to become more active. --JustBerry (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--AryanSogd (t) 17:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove No reason to hang onto this mostly unused hat. Widr (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Per Ajraddatz and MF-W their comments. I trust their judgement regarding inactivity behind the scenes. Natuur12 (talk) 22:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Per DoRD, Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 06:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC).Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --AFBorchert (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep removing the right from a trusted individual who is still occasionally active doesn't seem beneficial. Lepricavark (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Melos (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Per Marco.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Hardenacke (talk) 14:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - While not the most active steward of the bunch, Avi is among the most thoughtful and level-headed (but you guys are all great, don't get me wrong!). He's highly experienced in dealing with difficult and sensitive issues related to Wikimedia projects, and can be relied upon to provide a voice of reason when needed most. I agree that we shouldn't keep inactive stewards around indefinitely, but Avi is still present enough to be useful. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Alan (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Around on IRC to help out with issues. They've been helpful to me in many situations, most not related to steward stuff, but still there nonetheless. Net positive. ~ Rob13Talk 03:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -Barras talk 17:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 10:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep I trust Abraham and so I chose to keep it אני סומך על אברהם ולכן בחרתי לשמור אותו Itay17 (talk) 12:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC).Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Ultraexactzz Talk 16:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Slicha (Sorry) Ofek j (talk) 18:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep While not the most active steward, Avraham does enough to justify keeping him on, in my opinion. Kurtis (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral --Agremon (talk) 20:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral Per Ajr. --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per MF-W --rxy (talk) 09:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per MF-W. Nemo 15:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove My choice is unfortunately negative because it is not as enough active as. --Uğurkenttalk 18:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Experienced steward with sound judgement; definitely brings expertise to the team. I hope you will become more active this time though. RadiX∞ 20:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --masti <talk> 22:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - No concerns, experienced and overall a quality steward. I personally am not overly concerned about the activity level as Avraham's judgment is sound and in my estimation it cannot hurt to have more qualified stewards (the work has to be done by someone, why not spread the burden as much as possible.) Mifter (talk) 01:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - I believe his presence as a steward will be a net positive for the team. While his activity is low, that should be possible to fix, and there were no issues with his actions pointed out. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep While Avraham's activity levels are never particularly high, I've always noticed that he brings a different perspective to most steward issues, and is an excellent "bridgebuilder" in thorny situations. I see that some stewards above have noted that there's been little input from Avi behind the scenes, which is a pity and I hope you can take part more in the future! Snowolf How can I help? 09:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Encouraging a volunteer to work more cannot be done by kicking him. Also, every good action done for the community is a good action that helps others to do more good actions. --.js[democracy needed] 13:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Barras[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en
  • Personal info: Hello all! It's been a great time since I've been made a steward back in 2011. I've since then been usually around. In the past year, I suffered from serious health issues from which I currently try to recover. That is the reason why I was not really active in the last term. I'm currently not sure how much my activity levels will rise. I already dropped a few rights in November last year and I guess it's simply about time to also drop my steward rights. I really enjoyed the time and I'd certainly love to keep my rights, but I'm currently not really helpful and have no clue when I will be able to return to some more stable activity. After thinking a long time about it, I decided to not seek confirmation this year. I will, however, try to stick around. -Barras talk 13:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments about Barras[edit]


Bennylin[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: id, en, jv, zh-3
  • Personal info: Hello again all, and Happy Chinese New Year! I'm here to ask for your support for another year of stewardship. I'm mostly working with blocking spambots, and also sometimes requests via IRC every now and then need immediate response. Also I've started helping with steward's tickets starting last year. In 2017, there will be some major changes in my personal life, but I'm still aiming to be more active month-per-month basis from last year. Thank you. ✒ Bennylin 11:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments about Bennylin[edit]

  • Remove Remove Sigh. I've always found Bennylin to be a nice guy, and I have never had an issue with his countervandalism/LTA work. However, over the last few years he has gone through long periods of inactivity. That in itself is not grounds to remove a steward considering the activity when he is active. But, I have noticed numerous errors in his handling of user rights requests, even multiple within a 24 hour period, showing that Bennylin is not up to date on current steward practices. If inactivity results in this, it is a serious issue. Regretfully, I have to vote remove, because if someone has to be continually checking over his work in this area, they might as well do it themselves. Issues as follows: not realizing that most bureaucrats cannot remove sysop, again two months later, [7], granting IP block exemption on a wiki with local admins, asking a user to canvass for a local adminship request, removing rights that an administrator can remove based on an OTRS ticket and IRC. Similar mistakes have been going on since back when I was a steward. --Rschen7754 14:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC).Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove - Pretty much inactive for over 3 and a half years now...Stewardship is not permanent.--Stemoc 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral He has not been quite active, though I think he can continue to serve as steward. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral Concerns with limited activity. -FASTILY 19:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Miniapolis 20:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove - checked the reasons given by Rschen #1 --Rax (talk) 21:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove - stewardship is not for the inactive users. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per Rschen. Iazyges (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2012! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Concerns that inactivity is compromizing his practice. Per Rschen7754. —Ah3kal (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove, generally per Rschen7754. I am also concerned by a significant number of mistakes made by this user. Two points are particularly concerning: firstly, sending users who want to resign to local crats who cannot remove rights, secondly, removal of various Danny B. rights in cswiki (AFAIK there is a long conflict in Czech wikis involving among others this user, thus one should have been extremely cautious regarding such requests). In addition I see a logical problem in this: Bennylin does not remove sysop rights on plwiki because it has local crats but removes autopatroller rights on cswiki even though it has local crats and many local sysops who can remove those — NickK (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--CreativeC38 (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove  Klaas `Z4␟` V:  16:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove I hate this, but Rschen7754 sums up pretty much my thoughts sadly. —MarcoAurelio 21:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Krd 11:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral I'm not able to really make my mind... --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral On one hand Rschen7754 comments above are really concerning, on the other hand, i think you can do better. If you stay on the role, please improve in the areas pointed above. Matanya (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove everyone can make mistakes, but one should learn from them and not just repeat them. --თოგო (D) 21:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove unfortunately these are similar words from other confirmations, though unrealised following confirmation.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 13:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove - I'm usually unconcerned with a few mistakes, but the frequency and level of these is concerning to me. These are all basic errors which should not be made. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Pnapora (talk) 22:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Gridditsch (talk) 08:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Jerrykim306 (talk) 13:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Plagiat (talk) 19:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Inactivity linked to errors in handling tasks. --JustBerry (talk) 07:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove gave him the benefit of the doubt last year regarding activity but he remained inactive. Natuur12 (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • * Neutral Neutral --Elmie (talk) 17:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per concerns cited by Rschen7754. Lepricavark (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral --Melos (talk) 19:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove  @xqt 13:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --cyrfaw (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Alan (talk) 19:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove The diffs in the first remove comment are compelling. ~ Rob13Talk 03:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -Barras talk 17:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Glad to say goodbye with you. --Meracritus (talk) 17:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Minoo (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Without prejudice towards him running for re-election in a year's time. Bennylin just seems to be a bit out of touch lately, per Rschen7754. Kurtis (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral per Matanya. Quiddity (talk) 21:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove --MGChecker (talk) 23:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral: the majority of the actions/comments mentioned in the first !vote don't feel abusive/dangerous to me, but I'd need to check logs and contributions better before supporting. Nemo 15:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral Per negative opinions --Uğurkenttalk 18:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral masti <talk> 22:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove Bennylin brings and has brought much valuable language expertise to the steward team, however the instances brought up by Rschen seem to indicate a pattern that is quite worrisome. We all make mistakes, and that's entirely fine. However, when mistakes are repeated and when post-incident handling is subpar, it's hard to support continued steward status. This is especially the case as no attempt has been made in this forum to respond to these concerns or propose ways to avoid repeating them :( Snowolf How can I help? 09:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Bsadowski1[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: …
  • Personal info: I have been a steward for over 6 years now and have had many good experiences with the current/past stewards and would like to continue to do so. Although I haven't been active as I used to be, I am still around to deal with people who use the wiki to vandalize, spam, and the other kinds of abuse. I look forward to working with the current and future stewards this year.

Comments about Bsadowski1[edit]