Jump to content

Stewards/Confirm/2021

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Translate this page at Template:Steward confirmations.

Warning

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

The 2021–22 Confirmation will begin on 05 February, and will finish on 26 February.

The 2021–22 Steward Confirmations are an opportunity for the Wikimedia community to comment on the performance of existing stewards. To make the process as smooth as possible, the confirmations are organized as follows.

To comment, please log in with an account that has edits (on any wiki) before 05 February. During the 2021 Elections, please mention if you are comfortable or unhappy with the use of steward tools of any of the people listed below and why.

After the election, stewards (including the newly-elected ones) are invited to review the confirmation comments and to give their impression of the outcome (consensus to confirm/remove etc.) on Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2021 for every steward who stood for confirmation. Of course, they are not required to do this for every candidate and will be especially careful to do it regarding someone about whom they expressed strong opinions in the confirmation. Non-steward comments are welcome outside of the "Final Decision" section, subject to the usual expectations of civility. Confirmation discussions will last one week after the appointment of the newly elected stewards. This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

All stewards elected before February 2021 will undergo this process.

See also:

Purge the cache of this page?

Stewards should create their statements. They can use the preload below:




logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: ko, en-3
  • Personal info: I was quite sick early 2020, to the point that I had to get a COVID testing just to be admitted to the hospital (tested negative though) - later when I was recovering, the "Wikipedia Foundation" saga happened and my activity in Wikimedia dropped to near-zero. (I was also busy with IRL event that suddenly emerged with COVID.)

    After few months, I started to edit again, but at a lower frequency. I am not sure if I am still needed at the WMF projects, given WMF's "We don't care about community" attitude. I actually thought of resigning, but decided to stand for renewal this year because I think community still benefits from having one more steward from Asian timezone.

    Only excuse I have for this year's low activity is COVID (yeah, easy excuse, but that's the largest hit around the world.). At least I expect my IRL pressure to (sorta) drop, so I will be more active this year. I've still processed some OS request and global locks involving suppression of usernames, in addition to what is publicly visible.

    These days, I am not sure if I want to be a part of this movement, but I still believe in the community, not the WMF.

    Full disclosure

    My contract with WMF is over, as indicated by SE2020 statement. (See also: SE2018 / Confirmation 2019 / Confirmation 2020)

    — regards, Revi 10:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about -revi

[edit]
Temporarily change the ticket. For some reasons, I decided to vote Keep Keep.--海の向こうは敵だ! 03:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: uk-N, ru-4, be-3 (only understanding), en-2.5, fr-0.5, es-0.5, nl-0.5, ja-0.5, slavic-0.5, romance-0.25, ukl-0.25
  • Personal info: Hello, this is my second confirmation as a steward.

    Last year the main issues that were brought up about my stewardship were low activity that also had a large gap in it. This time I have managed to be active quite evenly throughout the year. The total quantitative statistics of my stewardship aren't great, but if you discount global blocks and locks which were not the areas I have focused on, you will find me somewhere in the middle of the list actions wise.

    What I did focus on was primarily permission management on SRP and SRGP, communication with WMF in the monthly calls (I've attended roughly a half of them) as well as with the fellow stewards via our communication channels. The most uncommon actions I have taken this tenure were a couple of bigdelete usages in some major Wikipedias, requested at SRM. I've also been doing some user renames, being one of the two Ukrainian and one of the few Russian speakers with the access, as well as an amount of GS domain actions. Actions aside I was trying to be active in Wikimedia Stewards User Group, in particular making sure we do not stand asides regarding branding open letter. I've also done some outreach explaining the role of the stewards to other users, especially Ukrainian community and to lesser extent Russian community and just individual Wikimedians or groups of them on various formal and informal platforms (chats, regular virtual meetings, a Wikiconference)

    The challenges I've faced mostly are related to being conscious with the boundary I have to keep regarding my home community while also being helpful to deal with LTAs originating from it. I do act when I need to, and try to inform the community members on where the boundary shall lie, but if this ends up being uncomfortable I plan discussing it at a relevant administrator forum.

    If I am confirmed for another tenure I will continue doing at least the same, I do also hope to login to OTRS more, potentially dedicate some more time to do some counter-vandalism work I mostly prioritise low for myself. I hope to also work on some technical tools. It is heart-warming for me to see that many stewards are using my GIPBE logging gadget created last tenure for instance. I am also looking forward towards WMF figuring out the procedure to verify people's 2FA statuses proactively, I plan to get involved in this if there is room to help. If not confirmed I still plan to eventually work on the technical things, will stick around the usergroup and will probably eventually request permissions necessary to do some of the actions I've been doing as a steward, such as global renames.

    Thank you for the feedback and I am looking forward finally hitting 10 years as a Wikimedian this year either as a steward or not :) And for those reading the same day I wrote this, Happy Wikipedia Day! --Base (talk) 10:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Base

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: Hello everyone. A lot of unexpected things happened last year, and my activities decreased significantly in the later months. I am still trying to recover, but the progress is slow. I think I will only be able to be back by the end of this year, so I am not standing for confirmation this year. I will occasionally be active in other areas so that I could still keep that wikimedian feeling alive within me. Thank you :)

Comments about BRPever

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: I have been part of the steward team now for 10 years and hope to continue working with my colleagues. I have been primarily focused on handling vandalism and spambots across the projects. One of my goals for this year is to do other tasks that I have not spent more time on (such as rights changes).

Comments about Bsadowski1

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: pt-N, en-2, es-1
  • Personal info: It has been an honor and privilege to assist the community as a steward since 2017 and if I still deserve the confidence of the community, I would be delighted to serve for another term. I couldn't be as active as I wished to be in the past year due to personal circumstances and the pandemic, but I'm confident I will be more active this year. I'm looking forward to your feedback. Thank you for considering. Defender (talk) 06:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Defender

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-3, es-1
  • Personal info: I was elected a steward in 2007. 2020 has been a tough year for many of us. I had to find some onwiki activity to cover the many offwiki activities which used to keep me motivated. I found it in categorization and structured data on Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata. Hence, also my activities as a steward dropped a bit. However, I found some more motivation for steward activities some months ago. My main focus of steward activities changed a couple of times, and so I still help fight some long-time vandals and be available for various tasks. I try to help out in the background with my long-time experience and reach out to our partners. For example, I am one of the co-organizers of the Wikimedia Stewards User Group which I helped set up, and wrote the report for our 2020 activities. Since I got my IRC client fixed, I returned to a more active level there, too. With having these things on my table, I still think that I can enrich this group. I still enjoy playing a part in the stewards group although I am not anymore one of their most active members and I would like to provide my service once again. Thanks in advance for your feedback.

Comments about DerHexer

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: pl-N, en-3, fr-2
  • Personal info: This is my second confrimation after reelection in 2019. This year was in many ways unusual. I have been active in the first part, later I was inactive. There are some pros of working from home, alas, there are some cons as well. I have been thinking about stepping down. But I realized that I still can be useful in some ways. I still can help in AAR, in some elections as scrutineer or in some everyday work. If you think that this kind of activity will be valuable enough - I am ready to do the job. On the other hand, if you think that this is not an asset - I really do understand. I can offer my willingness to serve for another term. einsbor talk 20:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Einsbor

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: Hello all. Sorry, I am late with this statement. Apologies to those who have written kind words in response to my possible resignation. This has been a very difficult year for me. Sadly I have lost members of my immediate family to the accursed coronavirus. I had the virus for several weeks in the autumn (fall) and my health has not recovered to the same level as this time last year. On a less important level, my time has been additionally curtailed with working to counteract the effects of our beloved Brexit. I was thinking of resigning late last year but I have changed my mind. If I resign over this, it will feel as though COVID19 and Brexit have won. I believe I can still contribute and with your permission I’d like to try one more year as a steward.

Comments about Green Giant

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: tr, en-4, az-3, es-2, de-1
  • Personal info: Hello everyone. I'm a steward since 2017 and this is 4th time I run for confirmations. I'd like to serve another year as a steward. My activity has been moderate and I've remained reachable. I plan to increase that for the following year focusing on preventing spam/vandalism on Wikimedia projects.--HakanIST (talk) 06:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about HakanIST

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de-n, en-3
  • Personal info: I have been a Wikimedian since 2008 and a steward since 2014. On top of that, I am or have been active in various other areas around Wikimedia, most notably by working on Wikidata and by doing various tech things (user scripts, MediaWiki extensions, ...).

    Besides my volunteer activities, I'm employed by Wikimedia Germany as software developer for Wikidata.

    After reduced activity in the second half of 2020, I will increase my activity again. I plan to continue helping out with both on wiki work and by tackling steward related technical issues. Cheers, Hoo man (talk) 22:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Hoo man

[edit]
Weak Keep Keep. Serious inactivity concerns though. I hope promise to be active will be delivered on. Meiræ 02:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

C L @ S˲» 13:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, fr, es-2, de-1
  • Personal info:
    Like most other stewards, my activity and availability has been affected by the pandemic. I would still like to help out where I can, as there is plenty of maintenance work and improvements we can make to improve processes and tools used to protect projects from LTAs.
    Separate from the pandemic, I have been a bit discouraged by the lack of response from the Foundation to address a language/translation issue which would greatly improve accessibility for those who don't speak English so they can understand why they cannot edit a page or why they are blocked, and the necessary steps to get an exemption etc. if necessary.
    Despite there being 11 Wikimedia Foundation staff on the Language and Translation team, no substantive action has been taken on this task since October 2020, nor the closely related task filed in January 2020. Should this still be a problem next year I can say with near certainty that I would not stand for re-confirmation on the basis that the Foundation does not adequately listen to or support the communities which produce and maintain the integrity all of the content that make the WMF relevant. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Jon Kolbert

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: Fellow Wikimedians, 2020 was certainly an interesting year for the whole world and that has certainly affected many of our activism here in the wiki world. We have made progress as human race in the fight against pandemic and hoping to be back to normal a bit in 2021. It has been my privilege to support the community and project in this role since 2010 and if the community still trusts me with the tools, I am happy to continue for another term.

Comments about Jyothis

[edit]


Krd has resigned, and as such, his confirmation process was stopped by the Election Committee.. For the ElectCom, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-3
  • Personal info: Dear community,

    I would like to request renewal of my steward permissions.

    After one year my activity was nearly as intended one year ago, i.e. a little bit of everything with some focus on OTRS tickets, where I created around 6000 answers in the Stewards queue, with is around 75% of the total amount. As this was quite a lot of work, my onwiki steward actions may appear a bit lower than they should.

    Regarding my other roles, I think I'm still active above average in each of them, so I would like to ask for being confirmed.

    Thank you, yours --Krd 08:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Krd

[edit]

From the Election Committee: Krd has resigned. Steward requests/Permissions#Krd@global. — regards, Revi 17:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr, en-3, it-2
  • Personal info: Dear community,

    This year again, I would like to request renewal of my steward permissions for a sixth term. During last year I was mainly active on SRG and SRP requests. This year, due to some schedule changes outside of the Wikis, I haven't be active in small wiki monitoring at all.

    If I am confirmed as a steward, I plan to continue my activity on requests pages as well as giving a hand on 2020 admin activity review process as the previous years. Thank you, Linedwell [talk] 10:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Linedwell

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: es, en-2, fr-1 (can read and understand texts in an, ast, ca, gl, pt and few other romanic languages).
  • Personal info: Hello. On 2020 I've been active on various areas, focusing mainly on cross-wiki countervandalism, maintenance/housekeeping and anti-spam activities as well as responding to on-wiki requests of various types. I've also helped with the yearly admin activity review checks and the bot policy implementation, among other miscellaneous stewards' tasks (e.g. renaming users, clearing some backlogs, discussions, etc.). I think I can still be of service, and I'd like to volunteer for another term if the community think that's okay. Thank you. Best regards.

Comments about MarcoAurelio

[edit]

BACKGROUND: on 2 December 2020 you globally locked a user as an LTA (long term abuser). The Global account information indicates that this user registered an account on 3 November 2020 and has contributed a total of 50 edits and was blocked only on Meta.
This user came to my attention when they asked a newbie-type question on 5 November 2020 at the Village pump of the en-wikiquote. The same user posted a follow-up question on my user-talk on 12 November 2020.
It was only by a coincidence that I discovered this user was globally blocked as an LTA within less than a month of registration. Since I thought this was a potential new contributor I was curious to see what this user did to deserve the reception they got from our community.
According to the Global account information which is linked from the newbie's contributions page, you, MarcoAurelio, were the only admin involved in the blocking of this user on META, where the user made only one contribution to Wikimedia Forum on December 2 shortly before being blocked by you.
QUESTIONS:
  1. What is the definition of LTA ?
  2. Do stewards consult the documentation in regards to LTAs before blocking users for this offence? If so where is the documentation?
  3. Where can the community view and participate in discussions about blocking particular users for Long Term Abuse?
  4. What is the appeal procedure?
  5. Can any concerned user start an appeal procedureon behalf of a globally locked user?
Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 18:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to answer.
Regarding the account FCoonerBCA, they're far from being a newbie, because they're another sockpuppet account of Huik01, which has been abusing multiple accounts since 2009, that is, 11 years. The sockpuppetry was confirmed based on non-public tecnical evidence after a request, so I cannot share more details on that specific.
There's no formal definition of what an long-term abuse[r] is. We have to use our judgement to decide when a global lock is or is not appropriate, usually based on precedent and common practice. Of course, global blocks are there to stop vandalism/abuse so if there's no abuse, no global lock will be issued. The same is true if the abuse does not ammount to a level where individual communities can manage the case themselves. There's an information page with common reasons that have been used to request global locks but it's not a closed list. People can request global locks and unlocks at Steward requests/Global, and a steward will consider the request. Global locks can also be the result of a global ban, but those are always after community discussion and consensus (except those done by the Wikimedia Foundation pursuant the WMF Global Ban Policy and the Terms of Use; the community plays no role in those although some of those may be eligible for review). Locked users can inquire and appeal their global locks by email to our OTRS queue. Any user can ask the stewards to reconsider a global lock in the Steward requests/Global page. While Meta does not have any formal prohibition against proxying, it's best if the locked user themself addresses their concerns directly to us as usually we'll have questions that are best answered by the concerned user.
Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MarcoAurelio: Thanks for reponding. I have checked some of the links you provided, and am wondering if it is possible a mistake was made somwhere along the way?
Here is what I found so far:
  • USER:Huik01 was globally locked 11 years ago. This means he cannot even log in to any WMF-wiki. Before being globally locked Huik01 was indef-blocked on enwiki in 2009 as a 'Vandalism-only account and his talk-page access was removed immediately. The admin who single-handedly carried both blocking actions (User:Tnxman307) is "Retired" according to their enwiki userpage.
  • On enWikinews Huik01 was indef-blocked because of: Abusing multiple accounts: Sock of banned troll" by User:Blood Red Sandman who according to their enWN userpage is no longer an admin.
  • On enSimple Huik01 was indef-blocked because of: blocked on other projects as well as other reasons by User:Juliancolton who is no longer an admin on ensimple but is still an admin at both enwiki and commons.
Can you shed more light on this situation? Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, but I cannot really know what motivates somebody to either keep contributing or not for any period of time, or keep infringing upon community rules and sanctions for so long either. Huik01's enwiki talk page was not removed immediatelly as you claim: only after abusing their talk page posting homophobic edit summaries and racist slurs the admin revoked their talk page access. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for responding, MarcoAurelio. Yes those edits which you have linked to are pretty bad. As far as talk page was not removed immediatelly according to my calculation only eight minutes elapsed between the time Huik01 was blocked and the time his usertalkpage access was removed. According to the enwiki block log: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/block?page=User:Huik01 Huik01 was blocked on 18:37, 28 December 2009 and their user-talk-page access was removed on 18:45, 28 December 2009. Ottawahitech (talk) 01:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: Dear WMF Community, it has been a great pleasure for me to serve the community for the past 10 years as a steward, like the past couple of years I was mainly active in the field of fighting and long-term abusers and spambots, I was regularly available on IRC for emergency occasions and monitoring Small wikis and helping urgent requests. Given my stable status in life, I would like to serve the community for another year. Mardetanha (talk) 15:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Mardetanha

[edit]
From what I know Wikimedia foundation is working on the case, probably Trust and Safety team can provide a better update of the case. Mardetanha (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is comment is both insulting to me and to Wikimedia Foundation, The Foundation's travel grant process is completely separate from T&S or any other part of the Foundation. The assumption that it is one giant, a homogeneous organization is wrong. Mardetanha (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I never said the Travel Grant was part of T&S. I never said the Foundation was homogeneous. I said I don't trust you to be a Steward, because you should have known not to close the RFC when you had a direct financial conflict of interest. You would not have received the grant $$$ had the RFC been closed in accordance with consensus.
If it was simply a mistake and you failed to notice the conflict of interest, you should have immediately withdrawn the close when that conflict was brought to your attention. Instead you refused, arguing that grant $$$ "was/is not something of value".[2] Alsee (talk) 16:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is more assuring for me that you don't understand what you are talking about, I am disgusted by your comment Mardetanha (talk) 06:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: cs, en-3
  • Personal info: Dear community,

    This is my first confirmation as a Wikimedia Steward. As I still enjoy doing the stewardry work, I would like to continue in a next term. I don't have a dedicated area of stewardry work to focus on, and I always try to help wherever I can.

    Outside of my steward role, I'm a Czech Wikipedia administrator, bureaucrat and checkuser. In the last year, my list of homewikis got expanded, as I'm now also a Wikidata administrator. I'm also active at Wikimedia Phabricator.

    Disclaimer: I'm a Wikimedia Foundation contractor, working as a Czech Wikipedia community ambassador for the Growth team. For more details, see my staff userpage.

Comments about Martin Urbanec

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: pl-N, en-4, de-3, ru-2, several European -1
  • Personal info: I am keeping my work in cross wiki vandalism mainly concentrating on Long Term Abusers and crosswiki spambots. Also trying to help with checkuser function on small wikis. I am easily available on stewards IRC so can react quickly on the incoming requests. I think I will be able to keep with at least same level of activity in the coming year. masti <talk> 22:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Masti

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: Hello, similar to past years, I have done mainly anti-vandalism/spam and patrolling. I also help in other stewards work such as on phabricator and technical spaces like stewardsbots. In addition I am in touch with various stakeholders in the movement to help in steward-related work and advice. I'm on IRC regularly and try to be helpful. I'm planning to remain active this year. Questions and comments are welcome. Best Matanya (talk) 12:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Matanya

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: Due to my work and the global situation, I was unable to serve the community as I wanted. To preserve my privacy I can't give further informations. Anyway I'm happy to serve the comunity as a steward for another year if the community will trust me as for other past years.

Comments about Melos

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en-N, es-3
  • Personal info: Hello, this is my first steward confirmation. When I applied for stewardship last year, I had big plans. Unfortunately, as was the case for many of us, the year didn't play out like I hoped. The pandemic and political climate severely inhibited my productivity, both on and off the wiki. Instead of working on the spambot problem, writing technical tools for stewards, and becoming a regular at SR, my activity has chiefly been in reaction to automation I use, rather than me seeking work to do. That said, I still like to think I've done some good work, and I am feeling much more confident about 2021.

    I'd like to point for anyone reviewing Special:Log/MusikAnimal that given the nature of my steward work in 2020, many or perhaps most of my actions are not publicly visible. For those with the requisite rights, there's more to be seen in the suppression log.

    As for things that could have gone better, I made a terrifying mistake on English Wikipedia where I accidentally imported revisions to a few very high-risk templates, but amazingly nothing actually broke. In response I have banned myself from using the Special:Import interface on English Wikipedia. The only other mishap to my knowledge was a simple newbie mistake that also didn't seem to do much harm, so overall I'm content with how I've adjusted to the toolset, though I think I still have plenty to learn.

    Disclaimer: I am an engineer on WMF's Community Tech team. As noted in my statement last year, I have not experienced nor foresee any negative crossover with these roles given my focus as a steward is routine, uncontroversial counter-vandalism and maintenance.

    I hope despite my less than ideal productivity (at least by my standards), I am still doing a good job and have had a positive impact. I look forward to accomplishing much more in the years to come. Thank you for the feedback. MusikAnimal talk 03:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about MusikAnimal

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: BN-N, EN-3
  • Personal info: Hello Folks,
    I’ve recently joined the Foundation as a full-time employee and my professional role sometimes requires working in the field of similar interest as Stewards generally do. To avoid any potential conflict of interest, I’ve decided to step down after the confirmation. As such, I’m not seeking confirmation this year. I’ll continue serving the community in my other volunteer and professional capacities. It's been an honor serving as a steward for the past few years. I’ve enjoyed every bit of it! Thank you.~ Nahid Talk 05:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about NahidSultan

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, it-1, fr-2, es-1
  • Personal info: I've been a Wikimedian since October 2006 and have completed seven terms as a steward. I'm saying the same thing as last year: I believe I continue to have a record of attracting no controversy, both as a Steward and in my work on my main content projects (the English Wikipedia and Wikibooks). I've maintained a steady activity level throughout the year with the exception of a dip in late March / April caused by being responsible for business continuity planning in my day job - something that the pandemic made rather time consuming. I am active most days checking on the night's spamming attempts which is my main area of activity. I'm happy to continue and believe I have maintained an adequate level of activity and competence. I have no reason to believe anything will change during 2021 except I might get more time when we finally get some normality back into life.

Comments about QuiteUnusual

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, it-2, gl-1, sk-1, (sq, ms, hi)-0.5
  • Personal info: Hello, everyone. This is my sixth confirmation as a steward. Quite a long time has passed since I joined this team. As some may already know, I deal mostly with LTAs, cross-wiki abuse/vandalism/spam, but also process other requests like user rights management (both local and global), global renames, privacy related issues etc. I also do a lot of behind the scenes stuff, such as mailing list and IRC administration, and the management of the private checkuser wiki, which includes handling all these specific accesses as users get promoted or removed from their roles, but also other maintenance tasks permanently involved there. Due to the pandemic, I got completely busy in the middle of the year. I work with information technology at a state university; so, when things all went “on-line” in March, I found myself in a turmoil, and had to work around the clock to compensate it. Thankfully by the end of September they managed to hire more people, and things started going back to normal, as well as my activity on Meta. Despite of this, I kept handling some behind the scenes stuff and other private requests even on the lowest activity periods. 2020 was the harshest year for me ever, but I tried my best to stay committed on helping the Wikimedia community. Still, I am interested in continuing serving as a steward for one more year, now on my regular activity level, if confirmed of course. I think I am still useful to the corpus of stewards, and I hope I could get the opportunity to share my views and experience with the incoming stewards. Thank you!

Comments about RadiX

[edit]
Hello, Nosebagbear. Thanks for participating. As other stewards have already mentioned, given the rowdy situation involving hrwiki, it's unlikely that a steward alone would take any decision on it. There were some discussions over what was going on. However, in the present scenario, I also favor the view that the WMF T&S team is the most suitable instance do handle over it, since as stewards we should not act as a global arbcom. And as far as I know, they are working on the case. RadiX 20:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Radix: how would you say it is like a Global Arbcom - you'd only be assessing and executing a community consensus, as opposed to actually deciding an outcome? Nosebagbear (talk) 21:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't meant to compare the closure of a RfC to the commitments of an arbcom; it was just a unrelated example (and to hrwiki situation as a whole). Regards, RadiX 04:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: ru-N, en-5
  • Personal info: After ten years of being a steward I still feel that I am capable of continuing serving in same role. Speaking about the last year, I think that I was fairly active in almost all areas, which stewards are responsible for. In particular, I was active in the user local and global right management as well as in the processing global lock/unlock requests and in applying some global IP blocks. In addition to these areas, I handled checkuser requests from time to time and answered to local assistance requests on the SRM boards. Thank you.

Comments about Ruslik0

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: ja, en-1
  • Personal info: Hello, Wikimedians, This is my third confirmation as a Wikimedia steward. Thanks for confirmation in last year. The last year is hard to me and that is might be every peoples. yeah, COVID-19 situation. That situation caused me a frustrated to some real life and internet communication. For this, I took my stupid judgement with home wiki local community. I had dispute with some home wiki users for my home wiki sysop position and Wikimedia global Steward position. That dispute summary is below:
    1. I had write a "resignation request" to the home wiki sysop as a one of a local community member as per Stewards policy, ToU and some related policies, guidelines in personally.
    2. I opened RfC for mine.
    3. Some part of a community member said "that is abuse of Steward position. That is (Steward) power harassment". e.g. w:ja:Special:Diff/77088277 (this comment is already withdwawn); Also some one said "resignation request should be passed community consensus before personally message".
    4. I can not agree these comments without pointing which policy or guidelines based. Then I report that comments to T&S team due to I think these comments are violate of ToU's declined item "harassment" as not comply with Stewards policy#Corollary as they are still ordinary editors and any other position(s) they hold, are entitled to freely voice their opinions, state their view and be heard by the community, just as any other user may..
    5. I disclosed to I had report to T&S team to a commented user.
    6. A some one said above item is "Intimidation for local community".
    7. Then I got 6 months blocking at the Japanese Wikipedia as per local community RfB.
    8. Unfortunately, some user said "Should be withdrawn your T&S reports if you want to stay this community" (summarised).
    9. I got some other clearly harassment at onwiki and/or off wikis. e.g. Requests for comment/Steward rights abuse and threats by User:Rxy on the Japanese Wikipedia
    10. I got answer from WMF T&S team, And this case "Should be handled by local community and meta community." ; I agree with this.
    Yeah, Disclose of a reporting to T&S may gives someone to scary, and I'm lack of that consideration. I'm regretting my actions. I hope still work together with Good-faith Wikimedians for Wikimedia Movement. if I confirmed from the Wikimedia community, I want to continue steward and/or MediaWiki development. Thanks,--rxy (talk) 14:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Rxy

[edit]
  • Remove Remove Abuse of steward position. Should be remove. He was blocked on the home wiki project, JAWP for six months. Not only does he put the blame on JAWP's community, but he does not reflect on what he has done, per his statement.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove We need a better explanation for the long-term block on jawiki, your homewiki, that takes ownership of the problem. What was the accusation (especially for non-ja speakers)? Why did you do what you did? What will you do better in the future? From reading your statement (and I admittedly didn't look at the links, which I am sure 90% of people won't either) it looks like at best you were not careful with how you were perceived as a steward, and at worst you really did intimidate people at your homewiki with your status. Also no explanation as to what the dispute was about. Rschen7754 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • As explained in the statement, I just did "resignation request of a sysop at the Japanese Wikipedia" as a Japanese Community member in personally. After that, the community member said "That is abuse of steward potision". Why Steward(s) can not describe own opinion in personally when local community tries override Stewards_policy#Corollary? Absolutely, I declare to I'm have no abusing "steward position" (steward abilities). Which rights have a local community overrides Global policy (except global policy allowed that)? I never know. Could you please submit an evidences? Please note to the Japanese Wikipedia Community does violate of CheckUser Global policy in the past case: w:ja:Wikipedia:チェックユーザー依頼/MaximusM4氏のRfA関連#Remarks from the ombudsman commission.--rxy (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't understand. Why did you ask for a resignation? Because you don't like their opinion? Because they violated policy? There is a time and place for asking for a resignation, but if the response from the community isn't "thank you" but "how dare you" that is not a good sign. --Rschen7754 01:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is not "Demanding resignation of user:ぱたごん". after that rxy tried to intimidate and silence comments for rxy from the Japanese community.(I'm not good at English.I'll explain in Japanese.)
問題はぱたごんへの辞任要求ではありません。問題は,その後,rxyさんへのコメントをT&Sチームという日本語コミュニティにはよくわからないものを持ち出して黙らせようとしたことです。 --ぱたごん (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Twitter
#jawp ウィキペディア日本語版のコミュニティにはもはや WMF の基本理念や利用規約に従う気はないらしいので、利用規約違反の疑いがあるものには逐一 T&S チームに通報していきます。 — @rxyさん 15:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Since the Japanese Wikipedia community no longer seems to be willing to follow the basic principles and terms of service of the WMF, we will report every single suspected violation of the terms of service to the T&S team in order.

グローバルや他ウィキとは異なる(と感じられている)jawikiコミュニティーの性格・性質に辟易しており、もはやコミュニティー全体との敵対も辞さないという態度である可能性が少しあります。

— 青子守歌さん 13:17, 26 May (UTC)
It is somewhat possible that he is fed up with the nature and character of the jawiki community, which is (perceived to be) different from the global and other wikis, and is ready to antagonize the whole community.

Deliberately using greater understanding of the processes to further your own agenda is actively discouraged.

Making personal battles out of Wikipedia discussions goes directly against our policies and goals.

--市井の人 (talk) 12:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Remove Remove Stewardship is not for towering over other editors with the power you preceive yourself as having. Stewards should be answerable to the community. Naleksuh (talk) 14:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove, with regret. If rxy was a new candidate, and put themselves in SE, I probably would've opposed. No permissions on his home wiki, recent community-block, ... Also, the only reason why they would be able to put them into SE is that they have sysop at testwiki. I can't ignore this. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove per above. --IWI (talk) 14:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral I really respect Rxy as a person, but the recent issues gave me pause. I think these issues need to be addressed before I can support again. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove per a number of the above --Herby talk thyme 14:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Looking at multiple points of view with my limited abilities, that he was blocked from homewiki clearly needs to be considered in this confirmation, but I am not sure that this is an abuse of steward status or not. As far as I understand, I think the central point of the problem was what he recommended to an admin to resign and what he said he reported to T&S. My personal opinion is that he was at least free of abuse in global activities, and given that he resigned himself on homewiki when something went wrong, I can trust him until what happened on the homewiki is clearly revealed. I can change my opinion if it becomes obvious, but it's not yet clear to me. --Sotiale (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove ja:Wikipedia:管理者への立候補/rxy/20200416 As it stands, it's more than a flag of local disapproval. It is very unreasonable to think that the all-powerful full authority will be unconditionally extended to us. --市井の人 (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove - I have to disagree with Sotiale's (provisional) reasoning. Even if their community actions didn't indicate a flaw with their global actions, it would indicate a lack of sufficiently strong local support and general status. I don't feel testwiki sysop status should qualify for SE, and so on that ground alone I'm reticent to support. Now a great explanation might show that ja-wiki was acting very oddly or exerting local pressure to demand unacceptable global actions, but unless that is demonstrated I oppose. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove User:rxy,s home wiki is Japanese wikipedia. Stewards should not like to use his/her Permissions on the home wikis. rxy tried to use his connections with Metawiki to turn the conflict in homewiki to his advantage. rxy used his/her connection to Meta-Wiki to threaten the homewiki. As a result, rxy has been blocked on his home wiki.--ぱたごん (talk) 15:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep In condition that rxy should not act as a stward on jawp; in other words I still believe rxy could contribute much as a stward outside jawp. There was very unfortunate discommunication betweeen rxy and some of jawp people especially about the meaning of "report to T&S": some poeple were scared by the word "report to T&S" (which sounds very frightening indeed!), while rxy looked really suppressed or harassed by others. I, myself, thought rxy was too naive and out of oneself then (if you cannot keep yourself tough and shrewd, you should have wiki-break!). In RFB of rxy about 40% voted "long-term block", more than 30% "short-term or middle-term block" (probably for cooling down), and more than 20% "oppose", which resulted "six months".--miya (talk) 15:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove I agree with the above. --ToprakM 16:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove He / she performed an act of flickering steward authority and threatening conflicting users at JAWP. The person may deny it, but it is an act that cannot be helped even if it is interpreted as such.
This caused him / she to lose confidence as a local administrator at JAWP and was blocked by RfB in the community for 6 months, but there was no comment such as an apology to the parties after the block period ended. .. For this reason, I disagree with continuing to grant steward privileges to him / her.
As a Japanese speaker, I would like to avoid the absence of a Japanese speaker steward, but that is another matter.--Daraku K. (talk) 16:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)(I withdrew part of my remarks.--Daraku K. (talk) 09:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC))[reply]
  • Could you please submit an evidences? if you have no evidences, that is personal attacking. I did not "flickering steward authority" in any cases. I guess such as "when you does not resignation, I'll remove your flags" is clearly intimidation. That example or similar case SHALL be removed stewardship. However, I didn't these or similar things.--rxy (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You made such a statement to a specific opponent in an administrator confidence vote (ja:special:diff/77233887). You later apologized for this at your own RfC, but no matter how tired you may be, such a statement can be interpreted as "flickering steward authority."
Sure, my wording above may have been wrong, but unfortunately it has given the impression that it can't be helped in the JAWP community. --Daraku K. (talk) 17:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • rxyさんはまた、ご自身のRfAにてこうもおっしゃいました。
私は意識してそれをやっているつもりはないのですが、無意識に自分の利益のために他人をコマとして使う節があります。そして、利益が一致しなくなれば平気で切り捨てます。
  • 「無意識に自分の利益のために」ご自分がされたら、あるいは誰でもされたら嫌なことをしてしまう。要するに誰にも止められない宣言をされてしまっては十分脅かされました。--市井の人 (talk) 23:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
However, less than a few months after that, in May 2020, Marine-Blue was notified to T & S of a similar event.
I apologized to me for the time being, but when I saw the exchange with Marine-Blue, I thought that it was just a form. It made me wonder if the report to T & S was so light.
It's been a long time, but from the above, I can only think that I'm trying to use Steward's authority for my own maintenance, not for the right thing. I do not endorse Rxy as an administrator, let alone a steward.--ミラー・ハイト (talk) 03:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)typo.--ミラー・ハイト (talk) 05:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove sadly. JavaHurricane 03:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC) Reconsidering, Keep Keep weakly. The block on jawiki is extremely serious, but the work done against LTAs like ISECHIKA and other stewardry also needs consideration. No abuse of steward rights has been shown to have occurred, and that brings my concerns down a bit regarding Rxy's use of the rights. Rxy has been a very good steward, the block aside, and I'm willing to give Rxy another chance. JavaHurricane 03:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove. Home wiki block is a major red flag. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 03:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep per Sotiale. Although the outcome is obvious at this point. Meiræ 05:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep The block in homewiki is certainly not a good point. However, I don't think this is a reason for removal. I wish rxy a long and successful career as a steward. KantoDetectiveBot (talk) 05:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove I'm not really sure what to make of the controversy, I initially thought maybe they should have stood for full election again to see if they still had the community's trust, but they're not eligible to do so. So remove, but thank you for all of your past work. Legoktm (talk) 06:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral In global, I think there is no isse with rxy's activities as a 2020 steward. In particular, specify jobs that other stewards cannot do, such as automatic locking of Long-term abuse. Stewards do not exercise their authority on their home wiki. In other words, his activity as a steward should be evaluated outside of the home wiki. However, given the "trust" from the community, I can't say "keep". --mirinano (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Sotialeさんのご意見が最も状況を的確に捉えていらっしゃるものと考えます。これまでのrxyさんの対荒らし対処の実績も考慮すると、引き続きスチュワードを務めていただくのが好ましいと考えます。Infinite0694さんのおっしゃるようなスチュワードの地位を濫用した事実はないものと思料します。--Ohgi (talk) 10:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC) 以下のご指摘に基づき、最初の1文を最後に移動。--Ohgi (talk) 05:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ohgiさん(別名: 篠田陽司さん)は、rxyさんが始められたwikiサイトの二人きりの最上位スタッフ・共同運営者、いわゆるお仲間ですよね。--市井の人 (talk) 10:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      Translation - Ohgi's vote: I do not think what Infinite0694 said about Rxy misusing his steward position is correct. I consider Sotiale's interpretation of the situation to be the most accurate. After considering Rxy's track record of anti-vandalism efforts, I think it is desirable for Rxy to continue serving as a steward.
      市井の人's comment: Ohgi and Rxy are operators of the duo highest ranking wiki site which Rxy started. In other words, they are partners. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • 問題なのはT&Sへの通報ではなく、それをわざわざ人前で告知することです。この点についてrxyさんは「本件においてコミュニティの皆様、およびミラー・ハイトさんさんに、多大なるご迷惑と恐怖心、不信感、精神的圧力、時間的損失、不快感を与えてしまったこと、深くお詫び申し上げます。」との理解を示されています。また、rxyさんはミラー・ハイトさんに対し「現時点で私はスチュワード権限をもっており、」などを誇示した事実がありました。それでも「(rxyさんが)スチュワードの地位を濫用した事実はない」と考える利用者がおられるのですね。その是非はここでの結果として現れるのではないでしょうか。--市井の人 (talk) 00:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • なお、OhgiさんはスチュワードのSotialeさんを引き合いに出していますが、Sotialeさんのご見解は「(rxyさんが)スチュワードの地位を濫用した事実はない」ではなく「見つけられなかった」以上でも以下でもないはずです。上記で示した差分をご確認いただき、再評価を望みます。--市井の人 (talk) 00:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • 当方も今一度確認しましたが、Sotiale氏の原文を要約すれば「当人(立候補者)がホームウィキ(=日本語版Wikipedia,以下JAWP)でブロックされた事は明確に考慮が必要ながら、これがスチュワードステータスの濫用かは確認出来ません(=見つけられません)でした。少なくともグローバル活動における濫用は確認出来なかった。JAWPにおける行為が明確になるまで立候補者を信頼出来るが、JAWPでの行為が明確であれば票の変更の可能性がある。」と言う内容。要は「グローバルでは問題は起こってないが、JAWPにおいて問題が起こっている。しかしその問題行為(T&Sチームの件)は明確には確認出来なかった」と言う事で、末尾に「but it's not yet clear to me.(=しかし当方では(JAWPでの行為が)ハッキリしていない).」とあります。しかし、Ohgi氏の発言は、市井の人さんの仰る通りSotiale氏の発言を引用し、意図的ではないにしろミスリードによりSotiale氏が「地位を濫用した事実はない(事を確認した)」事を追認した」と言う体になってしまいます。Sotiale氏は「No fact of abuse status(=地位濫用の事実なし)」と言った濫用の事実が無かった事を断定する類の事は一言も仰っていません。よってOhgi氏の発言は非常に不適切と存じますし、善意に取って参考での引用の意図ならば「ブロックされた事実はあるが明確に濫用は見つけられなかった旨ではあるが~」なり付け加えるべきです。--Tece Onir (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • 「いわゆるお仲間ですよね。」は、特にここの投票権とかかわるものではないので、個人攻撃(人身攻撃論法)だと思いました。その他の点については、私の申し上げていないことを論じておられますが、ご意見はわかりました。--Ohgi (talk) 12:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
          • 「特にここの投票権とかかわるものではない」=「個人攻撃(人身攻撃論法)」というのがよくわかりません。「お仲間」を「ステークホルダー (stakeholder)」と言い換えても無根拠ではなく事実ではありませんか。--市井の人 (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
            • 本来の投票に係る事ではないので苦言としてこれだけに留めておきます。Ohgi氏においては「私の申し上げていないことを論じておられますが」と仰っておりますが、ニュアンス的に意図しなくとも、特段引用相手が英語である事を用いて、意味合いが違う事をあたかも事実のように引用している時点で実際そう取られてもおかしくない行為(少なくとも私にはそう感じられますし、善意に取っても当方指摘のように説明不足でしょう)であると感じられます。それを「ご意見は解かった」で淡白に済ませるのは、違う意図で引用されたSotiale氏に対しても、また投票するに当たって参考になさる方に対しても極めて礼を失する行為かと存じます(撤回修正するなりした方が宜しいかと思いますが)。以上場を汚すようですが失礼しました。--Tece Onir (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
              • Ohgiさんには前段に「Infinite0694さんの反対理由は事実誤認」というご自分の主観があります。これは記事を書く上で出典が示されていないのを独自研究とするのと似ています。そうなりますと善意に取ればInfinite0694さんおよび同様の反対理由がある利用者に「どのあたりがそうなの?」と聞くことが出来るでしょう(詳細にまで話を蒸返すのを避けていたのならお互い様です)。しかし中段でそこを省いてSotialeさんの賛成理由に担保させてしまいました。意図としては「自分の考えに最も近い」のがあったのはわかりますが(であれば言葉足らず)、傍から見たら齟齬がある以上こういうのは文脈として付会と言います。一方で後段に来るOhgiさんの賛成理由ではrxyさんのこれまでの実績というSotialeさんの賛成理由とは直接の関係はない点を述べているに過ぎません。--市井の人 (talk) 20:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
            • 誤解を招きやすいことはわかりましたので、文の順番を入れ替えます。当然ながら、私の意見の内容とSotialeの意見の内容は異なるものですし、Sotialeがスチュワードかどうかもこの場ではあまり関係ありません。私の意見そのものや意見を述べることが可能かどうかとは無関係な私の個人的状況を指摘することによって、私の意見の妥当性に疑念を呈する論理的な誤りを人格攻撃論法といいます。ステークホルダーとのご指摘については、ウィキメディアの利用者全てがある意味ステークホルダーなのですが、私はrxyのウィキメディアのウェブサイトにおける振る舞いやスチュワード権限の有無について特別な利害関係はないです。--Ohgi (talk) 05:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
              • なぜステークホルダーなのかと言いますと、おっしゃるとおり広義のニュアンスがあると思ったからです。これには理由がありましてOhgiさんは以前ローカルでja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/エンペディア180813にコメントを残された際に、ja:WP:AUTOの立場をお認めになりました。このガイドラインはen:WP:AUTOBIOではほぼ本人を対象としているのに対し、jaでは拡大してまさにステークホルダーを対象としています(こういったことを統括するスチュワードはさぞかし苦労するのだろうと思いますが)。で、私は事実に着目しただけでそれ以上は何も言っていません。私がOhgiさんのコメントの妥当性について結論を出そうとしているのは、それとは視点が異なります(ましてや差分等を示して説明しています)から詭弁でないことだけは確かです。また、人身攻撃≒対人論証とするにもたとえば「OhgiさんはWikipedia日本語版の管理者です」ということをここで自己紹介されても参考になるのと同じように、第三者がそれを行ったまでで、そこをどのように参考にするかは読んだ人にもよりますから、絶対的な言ってもいないことを言ったような受け止め方は理解できませんね。--市井の人 (talk) 07:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • No clue about the jawiki dispute yet, but I would like to Thank you very much!Thank you very much! for handling LTAs and other CVN stuff these years. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 10:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove Auto-GL and auto-blocking aren't actions that only Rxy can do. --Semi-Brace (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove RemoveAmmarpad (talk) 14:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove * Pppery * it has begun 15:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Rxy is one of most active stewards. Rxy is especially helpful in combat with LTAs on his languages. I agree to Sotiale, I also agree with the positive parts of Camouflaged Mirage's comments. I didn't understand very well the situation in local community. I tried to translate the case that caused the block with Google Translate, but I think it translated a little bad. My opinion like this for now. --Uncitoyentalk 15:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Mirer (talk) 03:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Geonuch (talk) 10:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 10:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove, being blocked for 6 months on a home wiki is a red flag. Yes, he is very helpful on LTAs but this is a serious problem — NickK (talk) 13:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove, per comments above. --Daniuu (talk) 17:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove, same as above. Poor attitude for a stewards. --LaMagiaaa (talk) 05:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove, As mentioned above, he abused Stewards rights, including threatening other users by "reporting to the T & S team." As a result, it was removed from JAWP Sysop and blocked for 6 months. So I don't think he can be trusted as a stewards.--Tece Onir (talk) 02:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove 一般利用者を萎縮させ恐怖を与える存在 / Steward who atrophy and scare users--フリー百科事典利用者 (talk) 06:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove because of T&S-related threats to users. MBH (talk) 12:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep I’m a sysop on JAWP. I do appreciate Rxy’s contributions in counter vandalism. In recent 24 hours, JAWP met 87 suspected ja:LTA:ISECHIKA’s new accounts. 14 of them have their home project other than JAWP. 3 of them created abusive global user pages on meta. LTA:ISECHIKA is beyond control of local projects. We need meta’s help; and Rxy serves it. Japanese projects owe Rxy much. Steward is neither the title of noble nor the rank of users. It is a nice cat while it catches mice.--Kurihaya (talk) 15:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Therefore I propose that Rxy may publish the code that is used to fight against ISECHIKA (the sensitive part may be published to checkuserwiki so that other stewards and jawiki CUs may know). On the other hand most locked ISECHIKA socks have no edits.--GZWDer (talk) 16:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • Doesn't make sense, why did you think the code should be open? Patterns are much meaningful. Also, the jawp community gave Rxy red flag in his RfB; the tasks for those LTAs will be done other stewards like current jawp admins do. We do not have to depend him action.--Semi-Brace (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral Toad62 (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral --Minorax (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove Because made a statement that could be read as an abuse of authority, "reporting to the T & S team.", in response to a small complaint, and because he was blocked from posting for 6 months on his home wiki.--Koyomiya(コヨミヤ) (talk) 09:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral This is just very sad to see, overall. Need to read into this more, it isn't clear how all this started. Leaderboard (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Despite everything I still have a lot of faith in him as a steward --Wim b 21:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep. I always considered the block on his homewiki to be worrying and tried to understand it (at the time but also now in this confirmation process). In my view, and being succinct, informing the submission of a complaint to the Trust and Safety team about an issue, regardless of the user's rights, cannot be considered an "abuse of authority" - I also don't find it "intimidating" (although that would depend on how it was done and I'm not a Japanese speaker). In the real life this is called "regular exercise of law". I also don't see it as an abuse to ask someone to resign - it would have been abusive if he himself removed the tools of someone from the jawiki who had not resigned. Besides that, as Uncitoyen said, Rxy is one of the most active stewards and I think that his removal will be a loss to the global community. And, also, the opposition of several members of the jawiki - many without any argument, sadly - cannot be considered a valid reason in itself since "strong local support" is not an approval / confirmation requirement and this process is guided by consensus. Érico (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Before I explain my supporting rationale, I would like to state that I have struck my neutral vote above. I have followed this discussion for a few days, and I understand where the jawiki users are coming from. What we need to consider here is a huge issue as it concerns Japanese Wikipedia and the entire Wikimedia community. It seems that many jawiki users perceived Rxy's comments here as intimidation (恫喝) of the community and abuse (濫用) of his steward status. He has since apologised for that comment. However, what remains as a fact is that many jawiki users were offended by that comment. That was why Rxy's adminship on jawiki was removed and he was blocked for 6 months. I agree with the users above that the block is indeed serious, and it cannot be overlooked. But I feel that there must be a misunderstanding between Rxy and the jawiki community. Having no trust from the local community is a big issue and hence we are discussing if we should keep Rxy as a steward. If we were to keep him as a steward, the misunderstanding between Rxy and the jawiki community may become deeper. One feasible solution which Miya mentioned, is that Rxy should not act as a steward in jawiki. But I'm not sure if that is possible, as stewardship is global. I'm sure many users agree with me that Rxy has contributed extensively as a steward outside jawiki. Without Rxy's contributions, the ISECHIKA sock situation might become out of control. I agree with Camouflaged Mirage on this part. Removal of Rxy's stewardship would be a huge loss on the Wikimedia community as only Rxy has the most experience in this area. I acknowledge Rxy's hard work and I would like to commend him for that. In any event Rxy's stewardship is removed, we need another Japanese user to fill up this important gap. I still trust Rxy as a steward, that is why I'm voting keep here. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Taivo (talk) 09:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep From what I have seen, the tension between rxy and the jawiki community seems to have arisen from misunderstanding of what "[reporting] to T&S" implies. While distrust from their local community is not favourable for rxy, their efforts against LTAs should be appreciated. H78c67c (talk) 18:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep --伊佐坂安物 (talk) 00:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep 結果はおそらく見えていますが・・・
  • 2020年の件はスチュワードとしての問題ではなく、一利用者としての問題と私は考えます。もちろん一利用者として問題を起こした人間を信頼できないというのはもっともな考え方とは思いますが、私はローカルで問題が起こればローカルでブロックすることができる以上、ISECHIKAの自動ロックなどRxyさんがスチュワード権限を持つメリットはデメリットを上回ると判断しました。--Q8j (talk/CA) 01:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: The outcome can probably be seen now... but I don't think the problem of 2020's incident lies with Rxy's stewardship status. It lies with Rxy as an individual user. There are certainly people who consider users who cause problems untrustworthy. However, based on my judgement, there are more merits than demerits if Rxy maintains his stewardship status to make automatic locks on ISECHIKA's socks, as he can be blocked locally when problems arise. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • 既に上で『rxyさんはミラー・ハイトさんに対し「現時点で私はスチュワード権限をもっており、」などを誇示した事実がありました。』と提示しておりますが、これを「一利用者としての問題」とするには無理があります。一般的にも公衆の面前における自分の地位・肩書き、所属等を明示した上での発言は、プライベートやオフレコでは済まされないでしょう。--市井の人 (talk) 07:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • 例えば上でKurihayaさんが「I’m a sysop on JAWP.」とおっしゃってますが、日本語版管理者としてコメントしたわけではなく一利用者としてのものでしょうし、例えば「私は〜〜で管理者、CUで〜」といってグローバル権限に立候補する人も、別に管理者として立候補するわけではないでしょう。「一利用者としての問題」とはそういう意味で使ったつもりですが、誤解を招いたなら申し訳ないです。--Q8j (talk/CA) 07:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • ここでの投票・コメントや全般的な立候補は権限を有するかとは関係なくできることです。ですから「〜であるから」などに続かない限り自己紹介に過ぎません。ところがrxyさんの場合、話の切り出しで「現時点で私はスチュワード権限をもっており、」としただけでなく、それに続けてスチュワード権限を有することによってできること(ご本人はそのつもりはないとしてはいますが)をひけらかしているではありませんか。よってQ8jさんの例えによる「一利用者としての問題」は誤った一般化です。--市井の人 (talk) 08:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • 付け加えますと、「スチュワード権限を有することによってできること」とは具体的には投稿ブロックとしていますが、この発言は2020年4月25日 (UTC) のものです。rxyさんは2020年4月16日 (UTC) の時点でローカル管理者の権限を失っていますから、「スチュワード権限を有することによってできること」に違いありません。--市井の人 (talk) 08:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • ポイントとしてQ8jさんがおっしゃった「ローカルで問題が起こればローカルでブロックすることができる以上、」というのも、そうはできなくなった元管理者がローカルコミュニティに対し「(まだ)スチュワード権限を有することによってできること」として投稿ブロックをちらつかせたわけです。これには恐怖で震えて当然です。--市井の人 (talk) 09:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep Keep Worth talking with (talk) 02:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC) LTA / locked account. RadiX 03:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep My comment is as follows:

As you all knows, I found the past comments at: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:コメント依頼/rxy_20200416

◇ただ、ウィキペディアンとして別のウィキペディアンに「意見」を伝えるのは自由です。会話ページで2人で話し合って合意できなければコメント依頼へ進むのが筋。今回は即座に「辞めます」と返事されたけど、自身に非が無いという確信があり権限を持ち続ける意欲があれば「辞任する気はない」と返事すれば済む話でした。◇「コメント依頼で意見を聞いてから解任に進む」という過酷なプロセスに進む前に個人的に辞任勧告する、というのは、むしろ親切なステップともいえます。解任投票にかけられ心折れてウィキペディアを去った人たちを忘れません。--miya(会話) 2020年4月25日 (土) 07:01 (UTC)

(above translation) However, as a Wikipedian, you are free to pass on "opinion" to other Wikipedians. If the two can't reach an agreement after discussing it on the conversation page, it is reasonable to ask for comments. This time, I received an immediate reply of "I quit.", but if you are confident that you are not guilty and have the will to retain authority, it would be enough to reply "have no intention of resigning". It is rather a kind step to personally recommend resignation before proceeding with the harsh process of "hear someone's opinion in a request for comment before dismissing him". I will not forget those who were forced to leave Wikipedia in the dismissal vote.

Special:Diff/77277809 追加文 3つ目「これは、個人的に、」以降のとおり考えております故、管理者としてやめても、一利用者としては居続けてほしかったからです。管理者は補充できます。しかし「嫌気がさして去ってしまう・去ってしまった利用者」は最小限度に留める必要があると私は考えています。--rxy(会話) 2020年4月29日 (水) 01:44 (UTC)

(above translation) I wanted him to stay as a user even if he quit as a manager. We can replenish administrators, but I think we need to keep "Annoying users who leave" to a minimum.

You can find more detailed discussions afterwards at: Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/rxy https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/rxy

Use machine translation for English at https://miraitranslate.com/trial if necessary.

From the above mentioned, I will support the comment of rxy. What's more, ""In the real life this is called "regular exercise of law". I also don't see it as an abuse to ask someone to resign"" as Érico pointed out at 02:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC). --Green (talk) 14:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not "Demanding resignation of user:ぱたごん". after that rxy tried to intimidate and silence comments for rxy from the Japanese community.(I'm not good at English.I'll explain in Japanese.)
問題はぱたごんへの辞任要求ではありません。問題は,その後,rxyさんへのコメントをT&Sチームという日本語コミュニティにはよくわからないものを持ち出して黙らせようとしたことです。

— User:ぱたごん
  •  Weak keep. I agree with the arguments that say that if Rxy were to run for an election now they would probably not be elected because they are not an admin on content wiki anymore and because the block is a big red flag. That is why my vote is "weak". This is a confirmation vote though, and we already know what kind of steward Rxy is. I know some rudimentary Japanese (~N4 JLTP wise), but I am certain that it will be very challenging for me to do the kind of work Rxy does, most notably dealing with ISECHIKA socks. I am pretty sure it would be for others too. Rxy is also helpful with some technical stuff. What I also rember is that when Rxy makes a mistake they take it very seriously. When it comes to the situation at hand, what it looks to me like is that it is mostly a local conflict, where steward rights were not involved and the only thing that was potentially involved was some degree of authority Rxy holds as a steward. In the latter case yes, that would be something I would expect a steward to be more clear about, but that is not a mistake I would want a steward to lose rights over (unless it happens regularly). I am also happy with the fact that Rxy communicated the situation to other stewards on Stewardwiki and on mailing list right away while indicating that it can be biased since it is them who wrote it. I see it as another indication that they are responsible person, and for this reason I can trust them to use their steward permissions globally while avoiding direct interaction with Japanese Wikipedia outside the indirect one of them locking the LTAs originating from jawiki. I shold also add that people should not be afraid to contact Trust and Safety team when they feel like there is a reason to do so. I have my trust in the team's judgement and if there is no valid reason for the team to perform any action they won't. --Base (talk) 15:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a safe assumption. There is no open community scrutiny of those proceedings, and we've already seen cases where T&S has taken questionable actions. But this is besides the point. T&S isn't up for voting here; someone who uses T&S as a threat/weapon is, and that behavior is not appropriate no matter what T&S does or doesn't do.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  21:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral --20041027 tatsu (talk) 06:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove --ZabeMath (talk) 11:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Araisyohei (talk) 12:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 23:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Comment He said "reported you to the T&S team" to some people on purpose. It can be taken as a action that preventing people from participating discussions. he said:

(https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88%E4%BE%9D%E9%A0%BC/rxy_20200416&diff=77246175&oldid=77245964&diffmode=source)


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: it, en-3, ja-2
  • Personal info: I'm honored to be writing here for the first time. If memory serves me right, I have never had the opportunity to thank the community adequately for the trust placed in me last year. It may not be apparent, but so far I have done my best to act in the capacity of steward despite the hard times that we are living in. Whether it be on Meta, IRC, or by email, I always look for requests or tasks that I can help with. And I plan on doing the same next year, should this confirmation be successful. Thank you for the feedback--Sakretsu (炸裂) 18:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Sakretsu

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de-N, en-3
  • Personal info: This is my second confirmation. Last year I stated that "I'm able to keep my overall activity level or even increase it." Well, actually my activity level dropped (imho) dramatically; to some extent due to my professional life, and because of Covid, which had (and has) a great impact on my life.
    I hope that I'm able to achieve improvements during the coming term. I still very much enjoy being a part of the wikiverse and the steward team and kindly ask for your trust in me for another term.

Comments about Schniggendiller

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: Hi All, I have been a steward since 2014, this is my Seventh confirmation. My activity levels were decreased in the past year due to personal reasons, covid, etc. Though I am not sure how 2021 will be, I am hopeful that I can be more active in the wiki world. so I would like to continue another year if I have the community support. Any feedback is most welcome. Thanks and Regards --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 12:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Shanmugamp7

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: ko-N, en-2, ja-1, zh-1, bi-1, tpi-0.5, eo-1
  • Personal info: Hello, everyone! This is your handy Sotiale.

    This is my first confirmation. I've tried to help in every area I can, without specifying a special field of activity. Among them, I think I have faithfully fulfilled my promise to help SRCU, which I promised you at SE2020, and to deal with spambots and LTAs.

    Here is a brief report of what I have promised you (2020 logs only):

    • I have processed approximately 80% of SRCU requests(247/307) since I was appointed.
    • I have locked 19,274(!) accounts of LTAs, xwiki abusers and spambots.
    • I have blocked about 5,000+ spambots exploit proxies.
    • Except in December when I was in the hospital, I always connected to IRC channel to help users and handle urgent OS requests.

    In addition, through the steward tool, I did the following:

    • I have renamed 1,470 accounts.
    • I help with Wikimedia incubator work and have been dedicated to changing Wikisets.
    • I have also worked on SRP, SRGP, and GS.
    • I have handled almost all OTRS stew-queue Chinese tickets.
    All tasks were handled by hand, and there was no automated work. I'm well aware that the community has allowed me to do my role with the highest support rate in SE2020, and I have felt responsible for it. Nevertheless, sometimes my work may not have been enough to satisfy you due to my limitations. Considering everything about my activities, now you can re-determine whether you need me or not. As always, I will follow the consensus of the community. Thank you! --Sotiale (talk) 12:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Sotiale

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fi, en-3
  • Personal info: Hi.

    I have served as a steward since March 2015 and I would be interested to continue for another year. Last year I was extremely busy in real life because of personal reasons so I didn't have so much time for steward tasks (I also informed my colleagues by mail beforehand). I hope this year it will change, and I will be again more active. I feel I can still be useful in this position. My activity is focusing in blocking cross wiki vandals and spambots and changing user rights and rename users. I'm available on IRC when I can and I follow actively my email. I count as my home wikis the Finnish Wikipedia, Meta-Wiki and Wikidata, in which all I'm an administrator.

    Thanks, Stryn (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Stryn

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: sv, en-3
  • Personal info: I have now been a Steward for nine years now so this is my ninth confirmation. My activity this year has been similar to previous years with a lot of spam-bots and cross-wiki vandalism. I can often be found on IRC for dealing with emergencies. With your support I would like to continue for another year. -- Tegel (Talk) 16:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Tegel

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: pt-N, en-5, es-2, it-2
  • Personal info: Hello everyone! This is my first steward confirmation.
    This year I was very active, though not as much as I'd hoped for due to online classes, which are harder to me than in-person ones. While active, I mostly handled global locks and blocks for LTAs, spambots, crosswiki abusers, and the likes, and also rights granting, while always being available on IRC for requests.
    I think I did a good work this year, and hope to be reconfirmed for this year. Thank you! —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 16:26, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Tks4Fish

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: Hello everyone,

    2020 has been a rough year for many of us. For me personally it couldn't have been more different than the year before.

    I started my tenth term with much enthusiasm, but as time went by reality struck me. Due to personal reasons I couldn't keep up with everything. I successfully handled the mailing list and private wiki requests, and also tried to do some steward actions, but I simply didn't have enough time to do everything I wanted. While I expect that the coming year is more calm for me, I must be honest with you. I'm not sure whether I can go back to my old activity. Still: I wish to prolong my stewardship - next October I'll be a steward for 10 years already, and I hope I can be both more active and be able to share my experience and knowledge with the newbies. I'm looking forward to your opinions and hope I could get the opportunity to show I'm still useful to the current stewards group. Thank you.

    Trijnsteltalk 14:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Trijnstel

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: IT, EN, SCN
  • Personal info: This year was clearly characterized by the impact of the pandemics which forced me to move most of my activities on PC, leaving me with very few available energy to spend here. Rather than acting without the possibility of a proper follow-up of my actions I preferred to even don't log-in, just keeping an eye to the OTRS. I'm still interested in the Wikimedia world, thus I'm back again, with a fairly level of activity.

Comments about Vituzzu

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: it, en-2
  • Personal info: Hello Everyone, the second year is gone. In this year I have contributed like the past year: primarily fighting spambots and cross-wiki vandals. It was a difficult year due to more work commitments than in previous years, but despite this I have tried to give and I intend to give a lot more to the project: I helped clear the page of SRG, CU, user renaming, blocking spambot and OP. I hope to have the opportunity to help WMF projects by serving as a steward for yet another year.

Comments about Wim b

[edit]


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: ar, en-4, he-1 and es-1
  • Personal info: Hello. This is my third confirmation. During last year I was active dealing with requests mostly on SRG, SRCU, SRUC and various other tasks from time to time. In addition, I used my steward access for fighting cross-wiki abuse/vandals/spammers and LTAs. Also, I frequently spend time on various IRC channels.

    Over the past year, I'm being more active on SRG (especially global un/block), admin activity review, Global AbuseFilter, help on SRUC complicated requests and other tasks. Also, I cooperated with a lot of local CUs and sysops to solve cross-wiki issues (of course, with the help of global sysops).

    Generally(CentralAuth), I'm bureaucrat, sysop and checkuser on Arabic Wikipedia, and sysop on multiple projects (especially Wikidata and Commons). Over the years, I have made more than 453K edits on Wikimedia wikis.

    I would be happy to continue for another term. If you have any questions or comments or suggestions, I would be glad to hear them. Thank you--Alaa :)..! 09:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about علاء

[edit]